Anna Himmelman Martinson was eighty-one years old and suffering from lung cancer when I met her the next afternoon, July 7th, 1995 at the Rothstein Elderhaus in Berlin, an exclusive senior citizens complex with elegant individual suites. A nurses aide served as an interpreter and that may be the reason that Anna thought I was a historian covering the family history. I attempted to explain my interest as an artist in Kirchner's shoe. This as well was misinterpreted and she began to talk about her uncle Jon and his noble service to members of Die Brucke. He was the one who kept the secrets, how he helped invent the stories and howwell he positioned the artists for lives of notoriety.

I began to feel that senility was driving the dialog until she stated that ' the shoe and the photos were always kept in the family, just like the in between work of Die Brucke'. I told her that I had spoken to Thomas Schuler about the photos. She became agitated and said that Schuler had been after the family fortune for years. I mentioned Kirchner's shoe again and Ms. Himmelman responded by issuing an emotional sermon on how The Himmelman Family is responsible for Die Brucke's place in history.

Jon Himmelman began by removing all transition type painting and drawings from the studio in Dresden before any exhibitions or visits by collectors. These he stored in an adjoining shed, which he often used as an open air studio. Many of the transition pieces were destined to be destroyed by the artists themselves once a study was complete, others would have been offered to the public, potentially jeopardizing the group's reputation as the new masters of painting, if it were not for Jon's silent editing process. By the time the original studio members seperated around 1912, Himmelman had 'edited' over 140 drawings, painting, woodcuts and posters. These included works by Mueller, Heckel, Kirchner, and Pechstein. Anna stressed that the artists knew about the editing and appreciated someone in the group, but not a direct member, serving as a critical voice. What Jon did with the work was never questioned and how could they? Jon worked for practically nothing and spent the majority of his time heating water and changing footbaths for the artists, especially Ernst (Kirchner).

I was following the story fine until the footbath part began. I interrupted, hoping to redirect the flow.

Footbaths? I directed the question at the nurses aide. The soaking of feet she replied. Anna continued. 'Die Brucke was about pain' The bridge between the outside pain and the inside pain. The outside pain was the world and the inside pain was in the feet. The feet control the body, the body controls the brush , the brush makes the art. I mentioned that historically Die Brucke and German Expressionism in general were known to be influenced by a number of elements, notably a change from past Germanic art styles, a response to the social and political climate, views of exotic lands, and especially color. Ms. Himmelman regarded me as a failing student. 'The country was gray, the streets were gray, old art was gray, the pain was colored. The shoes made the feet bleed. The blood was red.' With this exclamation, Anna shouted orders at the aide and gestured down the hall. I thought the visit was over. The aide excused herself and left the room for a moment and returned with a large garment box. She placed it on the floor between us. Anna motioned toward the box and said to open it. Under the yellowed newspaper packing was an antique black leather lace-up shoe. It was a woman's shoe or what I percieved to be what a woman probably wore around the turn of the century with the exception of the heel. The heel was wide and at least six or seven inches tall making the shoe appear as a miniature playground slide more than footwear. I couldn't imagine anyone walking in it. 'Look inside' directed Anna. I pulled back the long stiff tongue revealing a well worn interior with black stains of some sort originating from the toe area. I was informed that this was dried blood. 'So you see the Kirchner shoe'. Ms. Himmelman interrupted my stupor of wonder. 'So much fashion is with art. Die Brucke was not just paint it was life. Life is in the feet, so the shoe must reflect the life. This shoe reflected the life of art. All of them(referring to the artists) wore the art shoes in and out of the studio.' Anna reached into the box and retrieved a large packet of photographs. At first glance they appeared to be medical photographs of the human foot, but upon closer examination it was obvious that these were taken in a studio setting. Easels and canvases can be seen along the border and in the background of some of them. The foot celebration was secretly the foot suffering. Jon would send the photographs to the doctors in Munich and Berlin for advice on how to best treat the recurring ailments caused by the shoes. The letters accompanying the packets of photographs were from Die Brucke artists addressed to friends and family around the country. They are obviously 'edited' by Jon for they bore no postmark and all of them contained passages describing the foot pain, the endless hours standing at easels in mis-shapened shoes, the foot soaks and the vibrant colors of pain.

I wondered for a moment if there weren't larger garment boxes in Anna's other room. The only artwork hanging on the wall were the two Kirchner woodcuts, modest in size and quality. ' This is the end of the story' she announced. 'This is the real one, but I kept it long enough so now no one will believe you or care. Except Schuler, and he will never see this box, I am giving it all to the doctors, the Archive and Museum get nothing.'

The secret 'cult of the foot' was what Thomas Schuler had been after since 1959.He had the shoe in his possession at the National Archive for over thirty years and never connected it to anything but a New Year's Costume party at the Dresden studio in 1911.